Equal Justice Society

Violence Prevention Advocate Alex Sánchez Arrested by FBI Under Questionable Circumstances

Community and peace advocate and Executive Director of Homies Unidos in Los Angeles, Alex Sánchez was arraigned last week in federal court, accused of conspiracy under the RICO statutes for crimes he allegedly committed over the past 15 years. He was denied bail on June 30th despite an outpouring of support from the community.

These types of federal ‘conspiracy’ charges always endanger civil rights because they tend to be overbroad, vague and often times, outright false when the accusers have a long history of corruption, such as the LAPD.

In fact, in the late 1990s, Alex led a community grassroots campaign to shed light on police corruption and successfully exposed the CRASH Ramparts scandal where LAPD were found to have falsely framed Latinos on bogus charges.

This became one of the largest police corruption scandals in U.S. history with over 70 officers named as corrupt. Homies Unidos made an issue out of holding police liable to California state and federal law.

As a result, Alex was arrested and handed over to then INS (today known as ICE). After being deported, Alex successfully secured asylum in the U.S. Now that authorities in Los Angeles cannot attack Alex based on his immigration status, we are faced with his indictment.

Read Roberto Lovato’s analysis on his Of América blog (excerpt below) and a subsequent post, “Why Was Alex Sanchez Arrested? Uprising Radio Interview.”

I for one do not believe the charges. Rather, I think that these recent accusations are but the most recent in the long, rotten chain of attempts by law enforcement officials to frame Alex, who was regularly beaten, framed, falsely arrested, deported, and harassed by the Los Angeles Police Department since founding Homies Unidos in 1998. First and foremost, I spent the evening calling those who know and have worked most closely with him, and they ALL share that sense that, as one of his best friends told me, “He really is a good person.” I’ve known him for years and will be sending a strongly worded support letter like the many I’ve sent over the course of the many years and many frame-ups law enforcement has ravenously pursued. Those close to Homies and Alex know and are again feeling that cloud of anger and concern that comes with being harassed by authorities abusing the power delegated to them.

Also, Alex is alleged to have conspired to kill Walter Lacinos, who sources in the Salvadoran and gang communities tell me had, in the words of one gang expert interviewed, “many, many enemies in the U.S.-and El Salvador.” While most of charges levelled against most of the the 24 other plaintiffs point to physical acts and evidence, the one and most serious indictment (see full indictment here)naming Alex alleges that he participated in “a series of phone conversations” in which the possibility of killing Lacinos is discussed. No proof is offered to corroborate the charges relating to managing narcotics operations for MS.

Lastly, the sensationalistic judgements of many media and some law enforcement officials raises serious concerns, as well. Close scrutiny of the media coverage reveals an definite disposition to judge and convict Alex even before his trial begins. For example, almost all of the coverage follows uncritically the logic laid out in the indictment. No attempt is made to notice that, for example, Alex is not named in most of the 66-page indicment. Other plaintiff’s names appear throughout. Those reading reporting in the LA Times and other outlets might come away believing that Alex might be involved in the murder of seven people or in conspiring to kill another 8. Consider this note from today’s LA Times:

The arrests cap a three-year investigation into the gang and its cliques, which operated in the Lafayette Park area, west of downtown. Among the most serious allegations contained in a 16-count federal indictment unsealed today was the claim gang members conspired to murder veteran LAPD gang officer Frank Flores.

Those named in the indictment include Alex Sanchez, a nationally recognized anti-gang leader and executive director of Homies Unidos.

Notice how there’s zero attempt to clarify or give greater context to Alex’s story, even though he headlines most of these stories. Even worse is the way that law enforcement authorities like L.A. Police Chief Bill Bratton, who the Times tells us has a big “I told you so” for the city, use Alex’s case to build the case for punitive-and failed-anti-gang policies, LAPD Chief William J. Bratton said the Sanchez case reinforces the thinking behind the city’s efforts to consolidate and more strongly regulate anti-gang funding.

Read Roberto’s full post.


Comments

One Response to “Violence Prevention Advocate Alex Sánchez Arrested by FBI Under Questionable Circumstances”
  1. Jennifer Lawson Zepeda says:

    Having seen the corruption inside of Homeland Security and what they did to my husband, I do not believe anything the FBI publishes any longer. Having studied documents doctored by them for covert operations like Operation Condor, I KNOW they manufacture evidence and testimony to destroy human beings they target. Let me demonstrate the inner workings of our justice system in the following links:

    http://www.crimesofwar.org/special/condor.html
    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB125/index.htm
    http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB125/index.htm#docs

    One can say this was 30 years ago, but the U.S. climate of covert lies has resurfaced. So here are some more recent operations…in 2001.

    http://www.defraudingamerica.com/fbi_coverup_devecchio.html

    I met Alex Sanchez, but I did not know him, because I volunteered at Homies Unidos for awhile. I do know that he held my husband’s life in his hands had he actually been with Mara Salvatrucha, because he had some of the most private information possible about his case, including his immigration number and name. Had Alex been what they represent, I’m certain my husband and/or I would be dead by now.

    I also know that my husband’s past affiliation with this gang followed him to several countries, where some odd photos from 12 years before surfaced attaching him to this gang, even after he had left several years prior. A member of Mexico’s SIEDO investigating his application for residency there showed my husband these photos, which he had obtained from the FBI. Now, my question is WHY would the FBI track ex members of a gang from country to country if their aim wasn’t to persecute them for ever belonging?

    As to the question of anyone ever leaving a gang…Judge Joe Brown comes to mind, and my husband as well. Simply, people grow up and age out. They meet women they fall in love with and they want positive futures, and they are simply tired of running from the law.

    I have no love of MS-13! They are murdering deported members who try to leave that gang, and that seems like forcing slavery to me. I don’t know Alex enough to determine if he’s a good person or evil. But I know he was good to us, held our secrets in tact, and offered help to us when we needed it to get us through POW conditions that Homeland Security forced upon us. I know if he had been with MS-13, we would be dead by now, because he knew EXACTLY where I lived, where my husband was, and nothing happened. And I know that the FBI and Homeland Security has corruption within the ranks of these organizations that makes MS-13 look tame in comparison. Drugging my husband before his immigration hearings, holding him in complete isolation for 3 years during his hearings, purposely losing his legal files and CDs before many hearings, using every mental torture tactic since the holocaust. And I know that they did everything they could to drive him insane and destroy my life as well. What they did was motivate me to write a book instead. And during his hearing when they questioned me about his case, the state’s attorney was more interested in the book I was writing, than my testimony about what happened to us. I assume the idiot was trying to intimidate me. Two book publishers are reviewing this book as I write this, although they could turn it down still. I’m not intimidated by the Department of Justice, but reading about Alex Sanchez, I’m wondering if I should be.

    I know he was very compassionate about helping us with our case.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!