DOE v. KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS


Back to the press release

Download the brief (PDF)

Download the press release (PDF)

Media contacts:

Keith Kamisugi
kkamisugi@equaljusticesociety.org
(415) 876-0589

Eric K. Yamamoto
ericy@hawaii.edu

David Forman
david_forman@post.harvard.edu

 


Frequently Asked Questions:
Doe v. Kamehameha

Source: Kamehameha Schools

What is Kamehameha Schools?

Kamehameha Schools is a private educational institution that serves Native Hawaiians. The Schools were founded in 1887 under the Will of Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop, the last surviving heir of Kamehameha I, monarch of the Hawaiian Kingdom. When she died, a Westernized society in Hawai'i had pushed Native Hawaiians down to the bottom of the socio-economic ladder. Pauahi saw education as her people's salvation and left her vast estate in trust for the creation and operation of schools that would focus on and uplift Native Hawaiian children. Students at Kamehameha, in addition to being Native Hawaiian, also come from almost every ethnic group in the world, including Caucasian, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, Pacific Islander, and other indigenous peoples.

What exactly did the court decide?

A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal - which is one level under the Supreme Court - ruled two-to-one that the Kamehameha Schools' policy of offering admissions preference to applicants of Native Hawaiian ancestry is unlawful. The dissenting justice said, "Congress intended that a preference for Native Hawaiians, in Hawaii, by a Native Hawaiian organization, located on the Hawaiian monarchy's ancestral lands, be upheld because it furthers the urgent need for better education of Native Hawaiians…" The majority of the court rejected this interpretation of Congress's intent, reversing a ruling issued by U.S. District Judge Alan Kay upholding the preference policy.

What happens next?

Kamehameha Schools has requested an "en banc" review of the 9th Circuit Court's original three-judge ruling. The 24 judges from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals have until Sept. 13 to call for a vote or to request an opinion from the original three-judge panel on whether to rehear the case. If they vote for a rehearing, a randomly selected panel of 10 judges along with the Chief Judge would review the case anew and rule, but there would be no deadline for either the arguments or a ruling. If no judge calls for a vote by Sept. 13, Kamehameha Schools' request will be considered denied and KS has the option of seeking review of the three-judge ruling by the United States Supreme Court.

What's significant about the court decision and the schools?

First of all, it prevents Kamehameha Schools from completing what Pauahi intended - the restoration of the Native Hawaiian people through education. However, the court decision could impact all people of color in this country - not just Native Hawaiians. If left standing, the courts in this country potentially could prevent any private person, trust, or organization from giving educational scholarships or financial aid to a disadvantaged ethnic group. It threatens any private entity that gives financial aid to Latinos, African Americans, Asian and Pacific Islanders or Native Americans as a way of helping correct past injustices against people of color.

Why are Native Hawaiians so upset about the court decision?

The court decision represents another blow to the future of Native Hawaiian culture, which has been slowly eroded through the past three centuries. Let's look at the facts. In 1778, there were about 300,000 Native Hawaiians. In just a little over a century, by 1884, there were only 46,000. The Westernization of Hawai'i almost crushed Native Hawaiians and their culture. In 1893, agents and citizens of the United States overthrew the Hawaiian monarchy. What many people don't know is that from 1826 to 1893, the United States recognized the independence of the Kingdom of Hawai'i and extended full and complete diplomatic recognition to the Hawaiian government. The Kingdom had diplomatic relations with England and other countries as well.

Isn't this really about reverse discrimination?

No, it's not. Reverse discrimination assumes that you're dealing with two ethnicities or cultures that are equal. By giving preference to Native Hawaiian children, Kamehameha Schools works to redress the continuing economic and cultural harms to Native Hawaiians by providing for a first-rate education for their children. Many Native Hawaiians look to Kamehameha Schools as a way to obtain an education and break the cycle of poverty and disadvantage. Native Hawaiians are not seeking special privileges or handouts - we're simply trying to help ourselves and future generations through education, using private money.

But the school doesn't admit any white children, right?

Many in our student body are of Caucasian ancestry. Kamehameha Schools policy is not meant to exclude non-Hawaiians, but to include as many Native Hawaiian children as possible. The policy provides for the admittance of non-Native Hawaiian children if space is available after all qualified Native Hawaiian children are admitted. Not surprisingly, with more than 96,000 school-age Native Hawaiian children in the state and only 5,400 spaces available in the Schools' K-12 program, admission of non-Native Hawaiian children to the Schools is rare.

Are Native Hawaiians really that bad off?

Native Hawaiians today are still poorly represented in virtually every measure of socio-economic well-being, perform well below their peers throughout the educational system, and have significantly lower levels of educational attainment. Native Hawaiians have among the lowest incomes and highest rates of poverty in Hawaii. They have higher rates of teen pregnancy and higher rates of incarceration. Almost 79 percent of the public schools in Hawaii that have predominantly Native Hawaiians student body are in corrective action, compared with only 17.4 percent of public schools that do not have a predominantly Native Hawaiian student body.

Why should Native Hawaiians be given special treatment?

Native Hawaiians are not seeking special privileges or handouts. Like all people, we expect to be treated with dignity, respect and fairness. That means respecting the commitment made by the United States government to have Hawaiian lands used for the betterment of Native Hawaiians. That means honoring the 1993 apology made by Congress to Native Hawaiians, which specifically acknowledged that the 1893 overthrow deprived the "rights of Native Hawaiians to self-determination." And that means allowing a private institution, like Kamehameha Schools, to use its resources to provide Native Hawaiian children with an education that cherishes and encourages our culture.

I heard that Kamehameha Schools is very wealthy. Why should I feel sorry?

We aren't asking for pity. What we're asking for is justice and fairness. And the size of Kamehameha Schools assets is irrelevant to the issue. If Bill Gates left his wealth to create a private foundation to support people of color through educational scholarships, no one would question defending it from being attacked.

Why are you protesting against the judges?

We are not. The rally and march is not a protest against judges. We disagree with the court's decision and are calling attention to why we feel the ruling was wrong. We are hoping that the rally and march help educate others in the Bay Area community and the country about how important this issue is, not just for us, but for all people of color.

Who else is supporting your cause?

Up to 15,000 people, including many without Native Hawaiian ancestry, filled the streets of downtown Honolulu Aug. 6, in support of Kamehameha Schools and its right to offer admissions preference. Hawai'i Governor Linda Lingle - who is not Native Hawaiian - joined the march, telling the crowd that the ruling was "not a just decision" For our San Francisco rally, Tribal Chairman W. Ron Allen of the Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe, a Washington State Native American tribe, has told event organizers that his tribe and numerous others from the Northwest will support the rally.

Why should I care about this?

This is about justice for a people that have long been oppressed. And the court decision could impact all people of color in this country - not just Native Hawaiians. Also, if you love Hawai'i, remember that what makes Hawai'i a special place is its host culture, the culture of Native Hawaiians. Lose that and you lose what makes Hawai'i unique.

How can I learn more about the issue and about the rally and march?

Visit the Kamehameha Schools website at www.ksbe.edu.

 

Equal Justice Society — 220 Sansome, 14th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104 — Ph (415) 288-8700, Fax (415) 288-8787