Equal Justice Society e-Newsletter - Issue 2 - Fall 2004
SUBSCRIBE
Getting this forwarded from a friend? Subscribe to get our newsletter delivered directly to you!

IN THIS ISSUE

Eva Paterson: Vote as If Your Life Depended On It!

EJS Amicus Brief Charges Unlimited Campaign Spending Limits Rights of Communities of Color and the Poor

Stanford Law Review Study on Affirmative Action in Law Schools Marred by Questionable Data

EJS in Hawai'i: Praxis and Pono

Notes on the Right: Voter Participation and the Right

Civil Rights and Campaign Finance: Summaries of Key Law Review Articles

Preserving Access at the University of California

Staff/Board News and Notes

Become a Part of the Equal Justice Society

EJS Calendar



Newsletter Editors:

Elaine Elinson
Joe Lucero


Email Feedback

Stanford Law Review Study on Affirmative Action in Law Schools Marred by Questionable Data
By Bill Kidder, Research Associate

Soon after you read this column, UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander's empirical attack on law school affirmative action will appear in the November issue of the Stanford Law Review.

Sander analyzes national law school admissions, grades, and bar exam scores, and comes to the provocative conclusion that because African Americans are "mismatched" at law schools where they are set up to fail, ending affirmative action at ABA-accredited law schools would actually increase the number of African American attorneys.

Yet an independent analysis by a coalition of legal scholars and civil rights groups demonstrates that Sander's study is plagued by an alarming number of methodological errors and false assumptions.

EJS is collaborating with leading legal scholars and social scientists, including David Chambers and Rick Lempert at the University of Michigan Law School, a team organized by Christopher Edley, dean of Boalt Hall Law School, and a group convened by UCLA/Columbia law professor and African American Policy Forum executive director Kimberlé Crenshaw, to independently analyze Sander's data and assumptions.

On behalf of EJS, I will co-author a response with Chambers and Lempert that will be submitted to the Stanford Law Review, and my longer critique of Sander, titled "Dubious Data, Problematic Paradigm," will soon be posted on the EJS website.

If you have more immediate needs for data and information countering Sander's specious claims, please call me at
(415) 288-8708.

Like What We're Doing? Join, Donate to the Equal Justice Society

Your contributions make it possible for EJS to develop and support new legal theories and strategies to help ensure equal justice for all. Donations are tax deductible. To donate online to EJS, click here to go directly to the donation page.

You can also join EJS as a member:

  • To support a national progressive movement
  • To interact with progressive lawyers, judges, scholars, policy experts, students and journalists
  • To receive free or reduced admission to many EJS events
  • To receive special invitations to national conferences, regional events, local forums and panels, and CLE programs
  • To receive email updates on EJS events, news and programs
  • To help shape and develop a national, progressive voice

Click here to join or donate today!

The Equal Justice Society is a national organization of scholars, advocates and concerned individuals advancing innovative legal strategies and public policy for enduring social change. We generate critical analysis on issues of race and social justice through research, public education and bringing together individuals from diverse backgrounds and disciplines. Our goal is to reshape jurisprudence to ensure that the rights of all are expanded, rather than diminished, by our courts and policy makers.

Equal Justice Society, 220 Sansome St, 14th Flr, San Francisco, CA 94104, Ph (415) 288-8700