|
Stanford
Law Review Study on Affirmative Action in Law Schools Marred
by Questionable Data
By Bill Kidder, Research Associate
Soon
after you read this column, UCLA Law Professor Richard Sander's
empirical attack on law school affirmative action will appear
in the November issue of the Stanford Law Review.
Sander
analyzes national law school admissions, grades, and bar exam
scores, and comes to the provocative conclusion that because African
Americans are "mismatched" at law schools where they
are set up to fail, ending affirmative action at ABA-accredited
law schools would actually increase the number of African American
attorneys.
Yet
an independent analysis by a coalition of legal scholars and civil
rights groups demonstrates that Sander's study is plagued by an
alarming number of methodological errors and false assumptions.
EJS
is collaborating with leading legal scholars and social scientists,
including David Chambers and Rick Lempert at the University of
Michigan Law School, a team organized by Christopher Edley, dean
of Boalt Hall Law School, and a group convened by UCLA/Columbia
law professor and African American Policy Forum executive director
Kimberlé Crenshaw, to independently analyze Sander's data
and assumptions.
On
behalf of EJS, I will co-author a response with Chambers and Lempert
that will be submitted to the Stanford Law Review, and
my longer critique of Sander, titled "Dubious Data, Problematic
Paradigm," will soon be posted on the EJS website.
If
you have more immediate needs for data and information countering
Sander's specious claims, please call me at
(415) 288-8708.
|