Equal Justice Society e-Newsletter - Issue 2 - Fall 2004
SUBSCRIBE
Getting this forwarded from a friend? Subscribe to get our newsletter delivered directly to you!

IN THIS ISSUE

Eva Paterson: Vote as If Your Life Depended On It!

EJS Amicus Brief Charges Unlimited Campaign Spending Limits Rights of Communities of Color and the Poor

Stanford Law Review Study on Affirmative Action in Law Schools Marred by Questionable Data

EJS in Hawai'i: Praxis and Pono

Notes on the Right: Voter Participation and the Right

Civil Rights and Campaign Finance: Summaries of Key Law Review Articles

Preserving Access at the University of California

Staff/Board News and Notes

Become a Part of the Equal Justice Society

EJS Calendar



Newsletter Editors:

Elaine Elinson
Joe Lucero


Email Feedback

Notes on the Right:
Voter Participation and the Right

By Lee Cokorinos

One of the silver linings of the 2000 fiasco in Florida was that it opened up broad discussion on whether America's electoral system has become so compromised that democracy is slipping away. Congress' decision not to assert its constitutional role in disputed elections by challenging the Supreme Court's Bush v. Gore ruling ensured that the more dangerous questions of system-legitimacy were snuffed out. The influence of Federalist Society clerks on the decision has also now been laid bare by dozens of other clerks in Vanity Fair magazine.

Over time, basic questions about voting and the health of democracy receded into the background in the major media. The passage of the Help America Vote Act gave most politicians the cover they needed to move on despite the fact that it had been gutted by a conservative Congress.

But the potential for an ugly sequel is crystal clear.

The legal right wing has used the last four years to, as former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan put it in the Wall Street Journal three days after the court handed Bush the election, "clean up voting and registration so that Florida never happens again." What they mean by cleaning up voting and registration, however, is far from what the League of Women Voters means.

Election law has long been a concern of hardcore legal conservatives, so important the Federalist Society has two subcommittees on it. Some of the movement's top legal figures, such as Frank Strickland, Charles H. Bell, and James Bopp (general counsel of the National Right to Life Committee) have spearheaded networking initiatives on election law for years. Manuel S. Klausner, a co-author of Prop 209, chairs the Federalist Society's Free Speech and Election Law Practice Group.

The Right's three priorities are toughening up registration and access, resisting campaign finance reform (chiefly by waging a bitter legal battle against the McCain-Feingold reforms, in which Bopp took the lead), and waging extensive ad campaigns to win over a slice of African American voters or discourage them from showing up at the polls.

Bush appointees

Within a few months of Bush v. Gore, large sections of their legal infrastructure were raptured up into the new administration. Among them were the late Hugh Beard and Hans von Spakovsky, named to the "front office" of the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division-the Voting Rights Section. Beard was senior counsel at the Center for Equal Opportunity, which has led the policy assault on affirmative action and "racial gerrymandering" (i.e., Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act).

Von Spakovsky, fresh from serving as a Bush volunteer during the Florida recount battle, became the administration's point man on voting. A veteran of efforts to keep down the Black vote in the run-up to 2000, von Spakovsky tenaciously advocated felony disenfranchisement through the Georgia Public Policy Foundation. He also served on the advisory board of the now-defunct Voting Integrity Project (VIP), which was involved in the massive purge of voters in Florida before the 2000 election.

Frank Strickland, the Bush-appointed chair of the Legal Services Corporation, heads the Atlanta chapter of the Federalist Society, and also sits on the Society's electoral process subcommittee as well as the board of the Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA). If a rerun of the Florida voter suppression disaster happens, the RNLA will be in the thick of the fight.

Legal Challenges

The Bush campaign has lawyers in every state, covering 30,000 precincts. This summer, to ensure that the Republicans could deal with any eventuality, the RNLA held a "National Election Law Seminar and School." Among its sponsors was Charles Bell, who coordinated litigation on the 2003 recall. Bell serves as the RNLA's V.P. for election education, co-chair of Lawyers for Bush-Cheney and the Federalist Society's election law subcommittee, and general counsel for the California GOP. He also recently represented Riverside County in an important case involving electronic voting, in which the county successfully fought candidate Linda Soubirous' demand for backup data relevant to a touch screen voting machine recount.

Attack Ads

Enormous sums, $7 million by one estimate, have also been spent since the 2000 election to depress minority voter turnout by running negative ads against the Democrats. Since the great majority of minority voters cast their ballots for Democrats, and would not consider voting for the GOP, many political analysts assert that the goal of these ads is to sow doubt and cynicism about the wisdom of voting at all, particularly among younger voters. "The whole idea is to alienate Blacks from their Democratic base so that they don't turn out and vote," argues St. Louis University political scientist Ken Warren. Congressman John Lewis (D-GA) said that these types of ads are "a deliberate, systematic effort to try to discourage African American voters from turning out," since "these people know that the African-American vote is not going to the Republicans. The whole idea is to confuse people and raise doubts in their minds."

Although conservatives have developed a habit of denouncing soft money 527 organizations, the Federalist Society's James Bopp was among the first to push their use. 527s have provided a legal umbrella not only for attack ads on John Kerry's Vietnam War record, but also to flood Black media markets with ads. Under-funded campaigns by competing voices have little chance of matching such efforts.

Richard Nadler, president of a 527 organization called Americas PAC, claims to have placed more than 11,000 pro-Republican issue ads on Black radio and BET TV in Missouri, Colorado, Minnesota, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, New Jersey, and Arkansas. Nadler produced an infamous ad in which an actress says of her decision to put her child in a private school, "We didn't want him where drugs and violence were fashionable. That was a bit more diversity than he could handle."

Nadler also formed Access Communications, which was selected by GOPAC (the organization formerly run by Newt Gingrich) to target African American audiences. Now headed by J.C. Watts, the former Republican congressman and board member of the right wing Clear Channel Communications, GOPAC bills itself as "the premier training organization for Republican candidates across America," and is now focusing on grooming minority candidates for state and local races.

The chair of the board of Watts' private consulting company, Randy Evans, is general counsel of the Georgia Republican Party and head of the legal team for the Bush-Cheney campaign in Georgia. He once served as legal counsel to Newt Gingrich.

The impact of the legal right wing's efforts to legally circumscribe citizen participation through voting, running for office, and communicating issues effectively will stretch well beyond this election cycle. If voter turnout stays stuck below 40%, democracy in America is in trouble. How well the voting system fares in coming days, months and years will be a good bellwether.

Lee Cokorinos conducts political research on right-wing movements and organizations. He is the author of The Assault on Diversity: An Organized Challenge to Racial and Gender Justice (Rowman & Littlefield, 2003), and can be reached at rightnotes@earthlink.net.

Like What We're Doing? Join, Donate to the Equal Justice Society

Your contributions make it possible for EJS to develop and support new legal theories and strategies to help ensure equal justice for all. Donations are tax deductible. To donate online to EJS, click here to go directly to the donation page.

You can also join EJS as a member:

  • To support a national progressive movement
  • To interact with progressive lawyers, judges, scholars, policy experts, students and journalists
  • To receive free or reduced admission to many EJS events
  • To receive special invitations to national conferences, regional events, local forums and panels, and CLE programs
  • To receive email updates on EJS events, news and programs
  • To help shape and develop a national, progressive voice

Click here to join or donate today!

The Equal Justice Society is a national organization of scholars, advocates and concerned individuals advancing innovative legal strategies and public policy for enduring social change. We generate critical analysis on issues of race and social justice through research, public education and bringing together individuals from diverse backgrounds and disciplines. Our goal is to reshape jurisprudence to ensure that the rights of all are expanded, rather than diminished, by our courts and policy makers.

Equal Justice Society, 220 Sansome St, 14th Flr, San Francisco, CA 94104, Ph (415) 288-8700