|
Hurricane
Katrina: EJS Responds with Lawsuit; U.N. Petition Aims to Expose
and Redress Impact on African American Community

By Shannon Seibert
Law and Communications Irmas Fellow
In
the months following Hurricane Katrina, the Equal Justice Society
worked to ensure more just treatment of evacuees and those whose
lives were forever altered in the aftermath of the storm. In November,
EJS filed a class action suit, as co-counsel with the Public Interest
Law Project, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights and law firms
from New York and New Orleans against FEMA in Louisiana's Eastern
District Court. The following month, EJS submitted a petition
to the United Nations and several United States agencies demanding
redress for victims of Katrina.
Legal
Action
On
December 9, a hearing on a Temporary Restraining Order and preliminary
injunction was held in McWaters v. FEMA. The hearing focused
upon whether the Federal Emergency Management Agency should allow
more than 100,000 people to be evicted from hotel and motel rooms
in mid-December, as the winter cold settled across the country.
Plaintiffs
argued strenuously that Judge Stanwood R. Duval should issue a
court order requiring FEMA to continue paying for hotels and motels
for those displaced until at least February 2006. The government’s
primary defense was a claim of sovereign immunity. Defense lawyers
argued that FEMA’s actions were “discretionary” and therefore
immune from judicial review. The government postulated that this
immunity was so comprehensive that it insulated FEMA from judicial
oversight, even in the face of blatant constitutional violations
by FEMA.
Ms.
Lenora Bartley, a pregnant New Orleans evacuee currently living
in Texas with her 8-year-old son, testified that she had to rely
on fast food for her family because she had no cooking facilities
in her motel room.
“We
had a life. We had stability,” Bartley said. Then, breaking into
tears, she added: “My son is looking forward to Christmas, I can't
even give him a Christmas.” The courtroom, filled with hurricane
survivors who made the trek to see firsthand the legal process
that would determine many of their fates, was visibly moved by
her testimony.
Another
plaintiff, Ms. Jessica Matthews was encouraged to return to New
Orleans by her landlord only to be evicted to make room for high-rent
paying contractors, a FEMA official and a former FEMA employee
who worked as a call-center worker. Matthews told the court
of her repeated difficulties accessing information from FEMA online
and by telephone. During her testimony, many of the survivors
sitting in the court echoed her frustration.
A
FEMA official testified that FEMA was overwhelmed by the onslaught
of hurricane evacuees and that they needed additional trained
personnel so that they could respond to the vast needs of evacuees.
Just
a few days later on December 12, Judge Stanley Duval issued a
temporary injunction against FEMA, ordering FEMA to continue paying
for hotel and motel rooms for evacuees through at least Feb. 7,
2006.
In
his written opinion, Judge Duval noted the disproportionate harm
suffered by the African-American community: “In New Orleans, 28%
of the city’s residents were living in poverty prior to Katrina,
and those who were poor commonly lacked their own means of transport….About
one of every three people who lived in areas hit hardest by Katrina
were African-American; in contrast, one of every eight people
in the nation is African-American. More than one in three [B]lack
households in New Orleans (35%), and nearly three in five poor
[B]lack households (59%) lacked a vehicle.”
The
judge further stated that FEMA’s refusal to continue paying for
motel/hotel rooms “not only discriminate[s] against victims based
on the grounds of economic status…but also violate[s] the intent
of Congress in providing for disaster aid to…alleviate the suffering
of those most affected by Hurricane Katrina.”
The
court also found that FEMA violated its mandatory duty by failing
to clearly explain the requirements necessary to receive Temporary
Housing Assistance. In the weeks and months after the hurricane,
FEMA’s actions led applicants to believe that a Small Business
Administration loan application was a necessary prerequisite to
receiving temporary Housing Assistance, though FEMA declared in
court filings that an SBA loan had never been a requirement. The
court ordered FEMA to disseminate information to evacuees to correct
the misunderstanding it created to expedite the processing and
disbursement of benefits for those in need of temporary housing
assistance.
“Katrina
showed us that the most vulnerable communities - who are already
victims of racial and economic inequality - will likely be the
ones to suffer most,” said Eva Paterson, president of EJS. “Had
FEMA been allowed to cut off support for the almost 100,000 hurricane
victims, it would have been another sad example of how this disaster
is less about rain and wind than it is about race and class.”
Political Petition
In
December, EJS filed a petition demanding justice for those affected
by Hurricane Katrina, addressed both to U.S. government officials
and the United Nations. Among EJS demands were that President
George W. Bush “Cease his continuing disregard for…the
economic and physical well-being of the American people – especially
poor people of color – in pursuing his agenda to weaken our federal
government,” and that Congress “Hold congressional hearings to
study the role of race and poverty in FEMA disaster response,”
and “Insist that Katrina’s victims have a right to return and
funds with which to rebuild their homes and their lives.”
Realizing that the pressure of international
agencies would be necessary to hold President Bush and his appointees
accountable for their actions and decisions prior to and in the
wake of Hurricane Katrina, EJS also made a demand to the United
Nations that it “monitor and investigate the willful human rights
violations committed by the United States government."
The petition was submitted to the U.N.
High Commissioner on Human Rights, with copies to the Commission
on Human Rights, the Human Rights Committee, the Committee on
the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and the Special Rapporteurs
on Internal Displaced Persons, Racism and the Right to Adequate
Housing.
The
response to EJS petition from the U.N. agencies was enthusiastic.
On January 6, Walter Kälin, Representative of the Secretary-General
on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons, responded,
“Like you, I have also recognised that natural disasters can give
rise to ... numerous human rights issues that require particular
attention, including with respect to vulnerable groups.”
On
January 9, EJS joined 36 other Non-Governmental Organizations
(NGOs) to submit a joint memo to the United Nations Human Rights
Committee. The memo detailed a number of human rights concerns,
including the failure of the United States "to guarantee
equal and effective protection against racial discrimination in
the context of disaster rescue, relief and reconstruction efforts"
in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Signatories to the memo
requested that the Committee question the United States government
as to what steps are being taken “to ensure that racial minorities
are not disproportionately affected by natural disasters” and
“to ensure that resources are equitably distributed to racial
minorities” in the wake of natural disasters.
EJS
is coordinating with other NGOs to ensure that Equal Protection
issues remain at the forefront when the U.N. Human Rights Committee
convenes in New York in March.
EJS
also is working with NGOs to develop a comprehensive communications
strategy for the March meetings and related public education campaigns.
|